{"id":423,"date":"2014-09-09T13:27:43","date_gmt":"2014-09-09T12:27:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/?p=423"},"modified":"2014-09-09T13:37:47","modified_gmt":"2014-09-09T12:37:47","slug":"dalsi-stret-zajmu-aneb-o-nas-bez-nas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/dalsi-stret-zajmu-aneb-o-nas-bez-nas\/","title":{"rendered":"Dal\u0161\u00ed st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f aneb o n\u00e1s bez n\u00e1s"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>P\u0159ijde v\u00e1m norm\u00e1ln\u00ed, \u017ee dvorn\u00ed architekt na\u0161\u00ed m\u011bstsk\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti vypracuje urbanistickou studii na \u00fazem\u00ed za uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvesk\u00fdm n\u00e1dra\u017e\u00edm pro soukromou developerskou spole\u010dnost? Asi ano, na tom je\u0161t\u011b nen\u00ed nic \u0161patn\u00e9ho. Probl\u00e9m nast\u00e1v\u00e1, kdy\u017e m\u00e1 ten sam\u00fd developer na tomto \u00fazem\u00ed sv\u00e9 z\u00e1jmy (pozemek) a m\u011bstsk\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st n\u00e1sledn\u011b p\u0159evezme tuto studii jako z\u00e1vazn\u00fd dokument a vyd\u00e1v\u00e1 na jej\u00edm z\u00e1klad\u011b \u00fazemn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed. Jedn\u00e1 se o dal\u0161\u00ed st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f v na\u0161\u00ed m\u011bstsk\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti.<\/p>\n<p>V roce 2012 si majitel pozemku, developersk\u00e1 spole\u010dnost EKOSPOL a.s., po\u017e\u00e1dal Magistr\u00e1t hl. m\u011bsta Prahy o \u00fapravu \u00fazemn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu na sv\u00e9m pozemku v Uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvsi. Jednalo se o pozemek za n\u00e1dra\u017e\u00edm o v\u00fdm\u011b\u0159e 11 120 m2, pro kter\u00fd byla po\u017eadov\u00e1na zm\u011bna koeficientu podla\u017en\u00edch ploch z E na G. Zjednodu\u0161en\u011b to znamen\u00e1, \u017ee na stejn\u00e9m pozemku cht\u011bl developer vystav\u011bt v\u00edce dom\u016f s v\u00edce nadzemn\u00edmi patry. U tohoto projektu se m\u011blo konkr\u00e9tn\u011b stav\u011bt \u0161est \u0161estipatrov\u00fdch dom\u016f (koef. G) m\u00edsto p\u016fvodn\u00edch p\u011bti \u010dty\u0159patrov\u00fdch dom\u016f (koef. E).<\/p>\n<p>Magistr\u00e1t hl. m\u011bsta Prahy v podobn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech kontaktuje p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161nou m\u011bstskou \u010d\u00e1st, od kter\u00e9 si vy\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1 stanovisko, zda je mo\u017en\u00e9 \u017eadateli vyhov\u011bt \u010di ne. Stejn\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem se tedy \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edci magistr\u00e1tu dot\u00e1zali M\u010c Praha 22, zda mohou spole\u010dnosti EKOSPOL a.s. odsouhlasit \u017e\u00e1dost na \u00fapravu \u00fazemn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu, resp. nav\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed koeficientu podla\u017en\u00ed plochy.<\/p>\n<p>V souvislosti s po\u017eadavkem firmy EKOSPOL a.s. vznikl za\u010d\u00e1tkem prosince 2012 dokument s n\u00e1zvem N\u00e1\u010drt regulace lokality \u201cZa n\u00e1dra\u017e\u00edm\u201d, kter\u00fd byl p\u0159edstaven m\u00edstostarostou Turnovsk\u00fdm i v pr\u00e1zdninov\u00e9m \u010d\u00edsle Uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvesk\u00e9ho zpravodaje. Tuto studii zpracoval Ing. arch. Petr Star\u010devi\u010d (sou\u010dasn\u011b tak\u00e9 \u010dlen Komise v\u00fdstavby a \u00fazemn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu M\u010c Praha 22) a obsahuje mimo jin\u00e9 i n\u00e1vrhy koeficient\u016f podla\u017en\u00edch ploch. Vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 z n\u00ed, \u017ee architekt Star\u010devi\u010d navrhl na cca 45% \u00fazem\u00ed za n\u00e1dra\u017e\u00edm koeficient podlahov\u00e9 plochy G a 32% \u00fazem\u00ed koeficient F. V praxi by tedy bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 umis\u0165ovat na tomto \u00fazem\u00ed a\u017e osmipatrov\u00e9 budovy! V p\u016fvodn\u00edm \u00fazemn\u00edm pl\u00e1nu byl pro toto \u00fazem\u00ed navr\u017een koeficient E, tedy max. \u010dty\u0159podla\u017en\u00ed budovy.<\/p>\n<p>Pokud se v\u0161ak se studi\u00ed sezn\u00e1m\u00edte d\u016fkladn\u011b, na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b naleznete tuto informaci: Regula\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1\u010drt zpracoval pro spole\u010dnost EKOSPOL, a. s. Ing. arch. Petr Star\u010devi\u010d. Ano, \u010dtete spr\u00e1vn\u011b! Tato studie nebyla zad\u00e1na M\u010c Praha 22, ale byla vypracov\u00e1na pro soukromou spole\u010dnost, kter\u00e1 vlastn\u00ed na dan\u00e9m \u00fazem\u00ed pozemek a m\u00e1 tedy logicky z\u00e1jem o nav\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed koeficientu podlahov\u00e9 plochy. Nav\u00edc tento dokument vytvo\u0159ila osoba, kter\u00e1 m\u00e1 na urbanistick\u00e1 zpracov\u00e1n\u00ed v na\u0161\u00ed M\u010c monopol. Existuje tedy d\u016fvodn\u00e9 podez\u0159en\u00ed, \u017ee pan architekt Star\u010devi\u010d protla\u010dil do sv\u00e9 studie sv\u00e9ho klienta takov\u00e1 \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed, kter\u00e1 vyhovovala firm\u011b EKOSPOL a.s. M\u00e1me zde tedy dal\u0161\u00ed uk\u00e1zku st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f v na\u0161\u00ed M\u010c, ke kter\u00e9 je veden\u00ed radnice op\u011bt naprosto chladn\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Zku\u0161en\u00e9ho \u010dlov\u011bka v\u0161ak zaraz\u00ed i fakt, \u017ee standardn\u00edm postupem pro urbanistick\u00e9 uchopen\u00ed takto velk\u00e9ho \u00fazem\u00ed by bylo zad\u00e1n\u00ed standardn\u00ed urbanistick\u00e9 sout\u011b\u017ee, do kter\u00e9 se p\u0159ihl\u00e1s\u00ed n\u011bkolik z\u00e1jemc\u016f. To zaru\u010duje porovn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed jednotliv\u00fdch n\u00e1vrh\u016f a vybr\u00e1n\u00ed toho nejlep\u0161\u00edho.<\/p>\n<p>Zp\u011bt ale k pozemku EKOSPOLu. M\u010c tedy tuto regula\u010dn\u00ed studii zpracovanou pro soukromou developerskou spole\u010dnost p\u0159ijala jako sv\u016fj vlastn\u00ed z\u00e1vazn\u00fd dokument, na z\u00e1klad\u011b kter\u00e9ho zaslala Magistr\u00e1tu hl. m\u011bsta Prahy souhlas s nav\u00fd\u0161en\u00edm koeficientu zastav\u011bn\u00e9 plochy, a to i p\u0159esto, \u017ee zde \u0161koly a \u0161kolky doslova praskaj\u00ed ve \u0161vech. M\u00edsto toho, aby veden\u00ed m\u011bstsk\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti zaslalo Magistr\u00e1tu hl. m\u011bsta Prahy, resp. EKOSPOLu, zam\u00edtav\u00e9 stanovisko (stejn\u011b jako nap\u0159. starostka M\u010c Praha \u0158eporyje) a p\u0159i\u0161krtilo t\u00edm p\u0159\u00edliv dal\u0161\u00edch obyvatel do Uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvsi, ud\u011blala M\u010c p\u0159esn\u00fd opak. Developerovi tedy nest\u00e1lo nic v cest\u011b, aby za\u010dal nab\u00edzet projekt pod obchodn\u00ed zna\u010dkou EKOCITY UH\u0158\u00cdN\u011aVES. EKOSPOL a.s. touto zm\u011bnou nav\u00fd\u0161il zisk z tohoto projektu v \u0159\u00e1du des\u00edtek milion\u016f korun. Oproti tomu sl\u00edbil M\u010c investice do vybudov\u00e1n\u00ed sportovn\u00edho h\u0159i\u0161t\u011b a 200 m nov\u00e9ho chodn\u00edku za cca 3 mil. K\u010d, co\u017e je oproti des\u00edtk\u00e1m mil. K\u010d jeho zisku zna\u010dn\u00fd nepom\u011br.<\/p>\n<p>Neb\u00fdt pohotovosti a odhodl\u00e1n\u00ed obyvatel z t\u00e9to \u010d\u00e1sti Uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvsi, developer by pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b ji\u017e nyn\u00ed stav\u011bl. Shodou okolnost\u00ed v\u0161ak bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e1 \u00faprava \u00fazemn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu nepro\u0161la hlasov\u00e1n\u00edm magistr\u00e1tn\u00edho zastupitelstva a je nez\u00e1konn\u00e1, tedy neplatn\u00e1. Fin\u00e1ln\u00ed te\u010dkou za p\u016fvodn\u00edm projektem EKOSPOLu pak byla \u017ealoba na nez\u00e1konnou \u00fapravu \u00fazemn\u00edho pl\u00e1nu, kter\u00e1 byla pod\u00e1na v srpnu 2014.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Co n\u00e1m jako Starost\u016fm a nez\u00e1visl\u00fdm vad\u00ed?<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>P\u0159ed studi\u00ed neprob\u011bhla s ob\u010dany t\u00e9to \u010d\u00e1sti Uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvsi \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 diskuze, jej\u00edm\u017e v\u00fdsledkem by byla shoda mezi ob\u010dany, m\u011bstskou \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed a developery na rozvoji tohoto \u00fazem\u00ed &#8211; o n\u00e1s bez n\u00e1s.<\/li>\n<li>M\u010c m\u011bla studii k dispozici pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b ji\u017e od prosince 2012, ale obyvatel\u00e9 se o n\u00ed dozv\u011bd\u011bli a\u017e z Uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvesk\u00e9ho zpravodaje \u010d. 7-8\/2014, tedy 1,5 roku od zpracov\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/li>\n<li>Studie byla zpracov\u00e1na bez vyps\u00e1n\u00ed regul\u00e9rn\u00ed urbanistick\u00e9 sout\u011b\u017ee, kter\u00e1 by zaru\u010dovala mo\u017enost v\u00fdb\u011bru nejlep\u0161\u00edho urbanistick\u00e9ho n\u00e1vrhu.<\/li>\n<li>Architekt Star\u010devi\u010d zpracov\u00e1val tuto studii pro spole\u010dnost EKOSPOL a.s., nikoliv pro M\u010c. Je nasnad\u011b se domn\u00edvat, \u017ee zpracovatel studie protla\u010dil do tohoto dokumentu takov\u00e9 limity (koeficienty podlahov\u00e9 plochy), kter\u00e9 vyhovovaly spol. EKOSPOL.<\/li>\n<li>Regula\u010dn\u00ed studii, kterou zpracoval pro soukrom\u00e9ho developera arch. Star\u010devi\u010d, p\u0159evzala M\u010c jako z\u00e1vazn\u00fd dokument a na jej\u00edm z\u00e1klad\u011b prov\u00e1d\u011bla kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00e1 \u00fazemn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed tak, jak tomu bylo pr\u00e1v\u011b p\u0159i \u017e\u00e1dosti EKOSPOLu o nav\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed koeficientu podla\u017en\u00edch ploch.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Regulace-Za-nadrazim-UHRINEVES-2012.pdf\">Seznamte se s urbanistickou studi\u00ed Regulace Za nadrazim UHRINEVES 2012<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>P\u0159ijde v\u00e1m norm\u00e1ln\u00ed, \u017ee dvorn\u00ed architekt na\u0161\u00ed m\u011bstsk\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti vypracuje urbanistickou studii na \u00fazem\u00ed za uh\u0159\u00edn\u011bvesk\u00fdm n\u00e1dra\u017e\u00edm pro soukromou developerskou spole\u010dnost? Asi ano, na tom je\u0161t\u011b nen\u00ed nic \u0161patn\u00e9ho. Probl\u00e9m nast\u00e1v\u00e1, kdy\u017e m\u00e1 ten sam\u00fd developer na tomto \u00fazem\u00ed sv\u00e9 z\u00e1jmy (pozemek) a m\u011bstsk\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st n\u00e1sledn\u011b p\u0159evezme tuto studii jako z\u00e1vazn\u00fd dokument a vyd\u00e1v\u00e1 na [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":429,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-clanky"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4U7EW-6P","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/studie1.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=423"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/423\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":430,"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/423\/revisions\/430"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stan-praha22.cz\/landpage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}